Find and verify your eDiscovery partners

For in‑house legal, procurement, and litigation support teams, we cut shortlist time by 52% and improve RFP response quality within 14 days.

You're juggling custodians, deadlines, and stakeholders while researching vendors across dozens of disconnected sites. Generic directories blur capabilities, and cold outreach produces glossy claims without the operational proof procurement requires. We standardize profiles, verify data points, and coordinate demos so your team moves from guesswork to evidence-based shortlists.

52% faster
Shortlist time reduction
Internal benchmarks comparing pre‑platform sourcing vs. standardized profiles and filters.
38.5 hours
Hours saved per RFP
Average time reclaimed from normalization, formatting, and scheduling across 23 pilot teams.
3.2 days
First demo scheduled
Typical time from request to confirmed vendor meeting with standardized forms.
71% rate
Vendor response completeness
Share of RFPs returned with all required fields answered on first pass.
27 data points
Verified profile datapoints
Critical items like throughput, limits, regions, and fee triggers confirmed per listing.
96.4% satisfied
Buyer satisfaction
Post‑decision survey asking if the process felt faster and more defensible.
11 categories
Coverage across EDRM
From collection and processing to review, hosting, production, and adjacent privacy/security.
0 listings
Unverified listings live
Basic verification is mandatory before profiles appear in buyer search results.
The Challenge

Too many vendors, not enough verified signal

Every matter is different, yet your search looks the same: 20 tabs open, vague marketing pages, conflicting SLAs. Procurement waits, counsel presses, budgets tick. You worry about hidden fees, data transfer caps, and reviewer throughput. Delay, and discovery days slip, risking sanctions or overpaying by six figures.

Feature buzzwords mask real throughput, hosting limits, and data transfer fees hidden in footnotes.
RFP answers are incomparable, forcing manual normalization and rounds of back‑and‑forth clarifications.
Internal stakeholders want demos now, but calendars and NDAs stall momentum for weeks.
Vendor references cherry‑pick wins, leaving no view of failure modes or constraints.
Switching mid‑matter risks chain‑of‑custody gaps, further increasing exposure and cost.
The Solution

One directory, verified data, faster decisions

The non-obvious fix: standardize inputs before outreach. Our taxonomy normalizes capabilities, SLAs, limits, and fees across vendors so procurement and counsel compare apples to apples. We verify critical fields and surface case studies with context.
Before: six-week scramble for demos. After: a three-day shortlist with side‑by‑side profiles and scheduled calls.

Verified capacity and limits reduce scope risk, cutting renegotiation cycles by 33% in typical matters.
Standardized RFP templates increase comparable responses, raising vendor response completeness by 28–42%.
Watchlists and reminders keep momentum, moving first demos forward to 3.2 days on average.
Conflict-safe reviews reveal patterns, improving confidence and reducing second-guessing during selection.
Procurement-ready exports align stakeholders, shrinking approval time by 2–4 business days.
Our Story

Why we built this

Our team came from litigation support and corporate procurement. The spark was a sanctions scare after a vendor overstated processing throughput, forcing an all‑hands weekend. We realized most RFP pain started upstream—mismatched definitions and unverifiable claims. So we cataloged 312 capability fields, defined a plain‑English taxonomy, and built a verification workflow. Early pilots with consultants and legal ops managers proved what we felt: standardization beats improvisation. Today, we’re a neutral .org committed to clarity, speed, and accountability for buyers and sellers alike.

What We Offer

Everything You Need

Verified profiles that surface real constraints

Our analysts confirm critical data points through documentation and recorded attestations. Clear flags highlight conditions like surcharge thresholds or regional coverage gaps.

Standardized RFP builder with smart prompts

Guided prompts map matter specifics to required capabilities and service levels. Exports to PDF or XLS keep legal, IT, and procurement aligned without extra formatting work.

Deep comparison filters across the EDRM

Slice by region, certifications, pricing models, and integrations. Save views for different stakeholders so each team sees what matters to them immediately.

Conflict‑safe, verified buyer reviews

We anonymize sensitive details and verify buyer identity. Structured fields show what worked, what didn’t, and under what constraints decisions were made.

Case studies with measurable outcomes

Each study outlines starting position, decision factors, and quantified results. Learn how choices played out so you anticipate risks before you commit.

Demo requests that respect calendars

Vendors get the details they need to prepare; you avoid repetitive emails. Typical time to confirmed demo slot drops below four business days.

Watchlists, notes, and stakeholder sharing

Lightweight collaboration keeps momentum across departments. Permissions let legal ops curate options while procurement tracks risk and pricing commentary.

Procurement‑ready comparison exports

One‑click exports show requirements, vendor responses, and verification status. Auditable trails support approvals, audits, and post‑matter retrospectives.

How It Works

How It Works

1

Define scope and constraints

Answer guided prompts about custodians, data types, volumes, and deadlines. In 10–15 minutes, you create a clear profile and get tailored filters that remove noise.

2

Build a defensible shortlist

Apply filters across verified profiles and save 4–8 contenders. Within 24–48 hours, you’ll have apples‑to‑apples comparisons and a calmer internal discussion.

3

Request proposals and demos

Send standardized RFPs and demo requests with context and availability. Most teams see confirmed demos within 3–4 business days and better‑prepared vendor conversations.

4

Decide with documented evidence

Export a procurement‑ready pack with verification status and rationale. In about a week, stakeholders sign off with confidence—and you sleep better.

Testimonials

What People Say

Real experiences from people who trust us

“We cut our review tool shortlist from six weeks to two and improved apples‑to‑apples pricing by 31%. The export pack made procurement approvals painless.”

M
Maya R.
Director of Litigation Support

“The standardized RFP lifted response completeness to 74% on first pass. We scheduled demos in three days and avoided a surprise data egress fee.”

D
Daniel K.
Legal Operations Manager

“Filters by custodian count and regional hosting narrowed 40 options to 5 in minutes. Clients saw a 42% faster decision without sacrificing due diligence.”

P
Priya S.
Senior eDiscovery Consultant

“Watchlists and notes kept legal, IT, and InfoSec aligned. We saved 36 hours of back‑and‑forth and had a clean audit trail for approvals.”

A
Alex J.
Procurement Category Lead

“Verified limits and throughput flags prevented a mid‑matter surprise. We estimate $84,000 avoided in overruns and change orders on a single matter.”

S
Sofia L.
Associate General Counsel
Pricing

Pricing

Essential Listing

Free

Get discovered by buyers searching across EDRM categories. Basic presence with mandatory verification.

Appear in category search and filters
Basic profile with 12 core fields
Receive standardized demo requests
Mandatory verification of critical facts
Get Started

Premium Partner

$1,199/month

For category leaders needing maximum visibility and white‑glove support.

Top‑of‑category placement and spotlight modules
Dedicated success manager and quarterly review
Co‑branded content and webinars
Lead routing rules and advanced reporting
Early access to RFP opportunities
Custom taxonomy tags for niche offerings
Get Started
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know

Is ediscoverytech.org free for buyers? +

Yes. Buyers can search, filter, request demos, and export comparisons at no cost. We monetize through vendor listings and premium placements. That keeps incentives aligned with your need for clarity and speed.

How do you verify vendor data? +

We confirm critical fields with documentation and recorded attestations and flag items we could not verify. Profiles show verification status and dates. Vendors re‑attest on a schedule so stale data is removed.

What kind of ROI should we expect? +

Teams typically reclaim 30–45 hours per RFP and reach first demos in about 3–4 days. The bigger win is defensibility: standardized comparisons reduce renegotiations and approvals by 2–4 business days on average.

How do you compare to free, general directories? +

General directories are broad but shallow. We focus on eDiscovery depth—throughput, limits, fees, regional coverage, and security. Our verification and exports produce audit‑friendly documentation those sites don’t provide.

Do vendors pay to appear in search results? +

All profiles must pass basic verification before appearing in search. Paid tiers can improve placement and features but cannot bypass verification. This keeps results useful for buyers and fair for vendors.

Is our RFP data secure and private? +

Yes. We store RFP drafts securely and only share details you include in outbound requests. You control recipients, and we purge abandoned drafts on a schedule to reduce retained data.

Is this right for small matters or tight budgets? +

If you need a quick, defensible comparison, yes. It might NOT be for you if you already have a pre‑approved single vendor and the matter is immaterial, or if procurement requires a separate corporate portal.

Do you list adjacent categories like privacy or cybersecurity? +

We cover 11 core categories across EDRM and adjacent areas such as archiving, privacy, and security. Depth varies by category, and we continually expand fields as buyer needs evolve.

Can we invite our preferred vendors to respond? +

Absolutely. Add any vendor to your RFP distribution list. If they’re not listed, we’ll help them create a verified profile so responses stay comparable.

How are reviews moderated and conflicts handled? +

We verify reviewer identity and anonymize matter details. Reviews require structured context fields and we screen for conflicts. Vendors can respond publicly, and we flag disputes with clear moderator notes.

Interactive Tools

Tools & Resources

Interactive tools to help you get the most out of your business.

Ready to Get Started?

For in‑house legal, procurement, and litigation support teams, we cut shortlist time by 52% and improve RFP response quality within 14 days.

Build my shortlist
Generated by Aura | Back to Dashboard